realityadmin (realityadmin) wrote,
realityadmin
realityadmin

See, I just don't get it...

There's been a lot of stuff in the media recently which is annoying me, and I keep meaning to vent about it. So here goes :) Today's fun topic is the idea of reserved seats on the Auckland supercity council for Maori representatives.

To quote from NRT - "...the hikoi has made it clear that an Auckland which excludes Maori will have electoral consequences."

This concept of excluding Maori intrigues me. It's cropping up in various news media, in statements from people who emailed in to Morning Report this morning, in interviews I've watched. But whereabouts in any of the proposals is it written that Maori will be excluded? There's been a lot of vitriol poured out accompanied by claims that Maori will have no voice if guaranteed seats are left out. Excuse me, but you do still get to vote, right?

In the same submission read out on the radio this morning, the submitter called for equality and quoted the Treaty of Waitangi as granting all Maori full rights as British subjects. Which to me says that they[*] have the same right to a vote as I do, and through this the same right of representation. But where does it say that there is a greater right of representation? Because I believe that's what guaranteed seats provides for.

[*] I actually feel somewhat odd using the concept of they/them and me, because as far as I'm concerned, I'm a New Zealander. And so is anyone who has Maori ancestry. Can we get over this them and us thing already? Apparently not, because a vocal section of the population seem to think that they want to be treated differently, and to have different rules applied to them.

For the record, when the elections come around, the race of the candidates isn't actually a consideration in my mind. Are they going to be good at their job, and serve the people well? (I'd love to say that I've found candidates who meet these criteria, but as yet I'm still looking. Still, one has to pick the best of the options presented). And those candidates should be there to represent everyone in the area they represent (however that area is determined) - Maori, Pakeha, Pacific Islanders, Asians...and New Zealanders. Not just one group. But whatever ancestry of the candidate, if they are one who has spoken in favour of this apartheid regime that some citizens seem to want, then I'm not voting for them.
Subscribe

  • Home again

    Safely home again from Canterbury Faire, which was a lot of fun, tiring, more fun, and still one of my favourite things to do each year. Thanks to…

  • Bye bye Rover 95

    For those who remember my old (1964) Rover 95, it's gone. I gave it away to someone who's interested in restoring it. It was that or restore it…

  • Peerages in the SCA

    So if you're not in the SCA, you probably won't care about this, but I've made it not friends only in case people not on my friends list find it…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 4 comments